This paper examines how legal inclusion shapes immigrant assimilation. I study the 1915 Dow v. United States ruling, which classified Arabs as “white” and thus eligible for naturalization. Using U.S. Census data, I show that Arab children born after 1915 received significantly less foreign-sounding names, with within-family estimates indicating effects comparable to decades of additional parental U.S. exposure. Difference-in-differences analyses relative to Poles and other immigrant groups corroborate these findings. I also provide evidence that intermarriage with natives increased following the ruling, while residential integration lagged behind. Importantly, these cultural shifts translated into economic payoffs: post-Dow cohorts with Americanized names earned about 24 percent more and were significantly less concentrated in immigrant-intensive manufacturing jobs. Finally, I assembled a new corpus of Arab-American newspapers (1890--1940) to study identity debates, offering the first systematic text-based evidence of how migrants internalized legal reclassification. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that legal recognition did not merely crown a process already underway but instead catalyzed assimilation—an insight of enduring relevance as contemporary pathways to citizenship narrow worldwide.
Draft available upon request.
🏅 MinE Best Paper Award, European Economic Association Congress
👩🏽🏫 Harvard PE/History Tea, ACES Summer School, Lewis Lab Student Workshop, Boston University Development Group, Harvard Econ History Workshop, ASREC, NBER Race and Stratification Working Group, Harvard Political Economy and Culture Workshop, European Economic Association'25, Economic History Association'25
This paper investigates colorism, racial discrimination based on skin color, in men’s football. Firstly, using machine learning algorithms, we extract players’ skin tones from online headshots to examine their impact on fan-based ratings and valuations. We find evidence of a skin tone penalty, where darker-skinned players face lower fan-driven market values and ratings. Secondly, using algorithm-based ratings and employing a Difference-in-Discontinuities design with geolocated penalty kicks data, we show that lighter-skinned players enjoy a premium higher by 1.25 standard deviations than their darker-skinned peers, conditional on scoring a penalty. Additionally, we find evidence that non-native players with dark skin face a double penalty. Leveraging the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment, we highlight the role of fans’ stadium attendance in algorithm-based results. The findings underscore direct skin tone discrimination in football and highlight fans’ role in perpetuating algorithmic bias. Working Paper
Updated draft coming soon!
🥈 Runner-up, Best Paper Award, MENA and Asia Political Methodology
👩🏽🏫 PolMeth MENA (NYU AD, honorable mention), Class for Sports and Society course (NYU AD), Association for Mentoring and Inclusion in Economics (AMIE, 3rd Applied Econ Workshop), ASREC/IRES Graduate Student Workshop, Applied Economics Seminar (PSE), 16th PhD Workshop in Economics (Turin, CCA), Sport Economics Guest Lecture Series (University of Tubingen)
We study how the behavior of older peers influences university track choices in Sweden’s centralized, strategy-proof matching system. Exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in the enrollment shares of older high school peers across eight selective university tracks, we document a discouragement effect: a one percentage point rise in older-peer enrollment reduces the probability of ranking the track as one's first choice by 0.15–0.87 percentage points (10–28 % of the mean). This effect is largest among applicants with low to average grades and from the gender in minority in the given track, while high-achievers---especially migrants in Medicine---are unaffected. Our findings reveal a track-specific rank effect of potentially lower self-confidence and heightened perceived competition, highlighting contexts interventions may be necessary to better align aspirations with ability.
Draft available upon request.
🇸🇪 The analyses are conducted using registry data from Statistics Sweden, with ethics approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority.
👩🏽🏫Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics, Growth Lab (Harvard), Swedish Institute for Social Research Lunch Seminar, Stockholm University Demography Unit Colloquium, Stockholm University Economics Department Lunch Seminar.
Microsoft Academic Knowledge Graph Schema: creation of academic networks
Iron Curtain and Big Data are two words usually used to denote completely two different eras. Yet, the context the former offers and the rich data source the latter provides, enable the causal identification of the effect of networks on migration. Academics in countries behind the Iron Curtain were strongly isolated from the rest of the world. This context poses the question of the importance of academic networks for migration post the fall of the Berlin Wall and Iron Curtain. Using Microsoft Academic Knowledge Graph, a scholarly big data source, mapping of academics’ networks is possible and information about the size and quality of their co-authorships, by location is achieved. Focusing on academics from Eastern Europe (henceforth EE) from 1980-1988 and their academic networks (1980-1988), We investigate the effect of academic network characteristics, by location, on the probability to migrate post the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and up to 2003, marking the year many EE countries held referendums or signed treaties to join the EU. The unique context ensures that there was no anticipation of the fall of the Eastern Bloc and together with the data that offers unique rich information, identification is achieved. Approximately 30k academics from EE were identified, of which 3% were migrants. The results could be explained by two channels, the cost and signaling channel. The cost channel is how the network characteristic reduces or increases the cost of migration and thus acting as a facilitator or a de-facilitator of migration. The signal channel on the other hand in which the network characteristic serves as a signal for the academic himself and his quality and his potential contribution and addition to the new host institution, thus also serving as a facilitator or a de-facilitator of migration. We find that mostly network size and quality results could be explained by the cost channel and signalling channel, respectively. Size of the network tends to be more important than the quality, which is a context-specific result. We find heterogeneous effects by fields of study that align with previous lines of research. Heterogeneous effects are explained by two things: threat of attention and arrest by KGB and the role of reputation, language, and network barriers.
👩🏽🏫 Doctoral Workshop (UCLouvain), Doctorissimes Conference (PSE), Globalization, Political Economy and Trade Thesis Research Seminar (PSE), CESifo Junior Workshop on Big Data
Infographic generated by ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2024)
This paper presents a content analysis of gender stereotypes in popular song lyrics using word embeddings. We begin by explaining how we curated a novel data set comprising lyrics from popular songs in the US over the past 70 years. We then explain word embeddings, detailing both their nature and their application to our lyric corpus. Subsequently, we present a case study that examines the prevalence of gender stereotypes across various music genres. Our findings showed that while all genres exhibited stereotyping of men and women, the specific content of these stereotypes varied significantly by genre, often in surprising ways, such as that gender stereotypes in hip-hop, often perceived as being distinctly sexist, were rarely stronger in hip-hop than in other genres. Finally, we reflect on the strengths and limitations of using word embeddings to study music lyrics and provide suggestions for their best application to sociological questions.
Submitted to the Bulletin of Sociological Methodology
Cover of the book Envar "Cacho" El Kadri: el guerrillero que dejó las armas
Updates soon!
xx
Updates soon!
Snapshot from the German Emigrant Database
This project aims to study the "sociology of innovation"; an adaptation of the sociology of industry by Granovetter (1998) by focusing on Germans who arrived in the US post the failed German revolution of 1848. The German failed revolution of 1848 marks the dividing line between early industrialization and the industrial revolution. In the Second Industrial Revolution, Germany was a pioneer in chemistry, steel, and machinery. Thus, observing Germans arriving from 1848 onwards, we can study the role of know-how, its transmission mechanisms, what matters for inventors, what happens to occupations of immigrants, what's the role of different skill composition, and quantify the impact on US innovation.
We are using the full sample US historical census, ship lists containing 4 million Germans that arrived in the US from 1850 to 1897 (containing information on occupations at home), yearbooks of R&D labs, and historical patent data (1790-2010).
More updates soon!